Home > Cpu Usage > Asterisk 1.8 High Cpu Usage

Asterisk 1.8 High Cpu Usage

Contents

I deleted that setting and it went back down to normal. -- thanks for the post. Ollie 2011-09-20 12:53:36 EDT *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 658431 *** Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes I noticed many of them stated "bad value" however I think that is OK as it was referencing things like language under extensions, which is blank in the FreePBX interface. addr=? http://1pxcare.com/cpu-usage/wow-high-cpu-usage-mac.html

terminal=? Top TrevorH Forum Moderator Posts: 17646 Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56 Location: Brighton, UK Re: [HELP] CPU usage VERY HIGH on a single core Quote Postby TrevorH » 2015/04/08 12:12:17 Asterisk does not Home Home Recent Posts Recent Activity Authors Download Download ISO Get your FREE license key Forums Search Forums Recent Posts Resources Search Resources Most Active Authors Latest Reviews Members Notable Members Connect 2 calls (2 sets of telephones) and start dialing DTMFs as fast as you can on one of them (or simply generate 2 calls and send the DTMFs as I http://pbxinaflash.com/community/threads/asterisk-100-cpu-usage.12968/

Asterisk 100 Cpu Usage

Excuse my english please. Do you think that is the cause of the CPU spikes? I thought we all get along! I decided to update them for 12.09 and came across a serious bug in Asterisk 1.8.

Problem started today but restoring from a backup from 3 days ago didn't resolve it. I couldn't reproduce it with an interval and duration within spec unless I set rtpkeepalive. There are many such examples - simply search for 0.000 (deltas which are less than 1 ms) to identify groups of packets that are sent together. Reply Grayson Peddie says: March 12, 2010 at 06:44 Ubuntu 9.10 does not have pstack.

Hide Permalink Rusty Newton added a comment - 24/Jul/13 3:28 PM Maybe setting rtpkeepalive simply triggers the problem faster, but is not the root cause for it? Ultimate Australian Canal Is it a security vulnerability if the addresses of university students are exposed? Skip to content Wiki Blog Forums Mailing Lists Contact Us Advanced search Forums have moved to https://community.asterisk.org Board index RSS RSS Change font size FAQ Information The requested topic does not http://community.freepbx.org/t/asterisk-1-8-7-0-uses-100-cpu-on-centos/12505 I just trust this forum for this question way more then theirs!

This only occurs in non Packet2Packet mode. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Modify Ticket Action leave as closed . Keeping in mind that this is most probably a performance problem, I can imagine that the CPU/System also plays a role.

  1. Additional info: asterisk ran just fine under fedora-14.
  2. One example of the problem can be seen at line 1235 in 'forward-stream-first-call-after-asterisk.pcap.txt'.
  3. Running the perf tool we get the following distribution of CPU cycles inside the asterisk process: Events: 12K cpu-clock, DSO: asterisk + 30.47% asterisk ast_dummy_channel_destructor + 18.92% asterisk ast_channel_destructor + 12.79%
  4. There's none.
  5. I can adjust the firewall if needed.
  6. Unfortunately, I cannot test with the SVN version on the physical server, nor can I install Ubuntu on it.

Asterisk Cpu Usage

avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 4.30 0.00 5.94 0.38 0.00 89.38 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 6.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 weblink Once it hits a certain number the cpu usage goes sky high for only a small increase in the number of channels. Asterisk 100 Cpu Usage Then open the file and search for the LWP that you just wrote down. Asterisk High Load Average Not the answer you're looking for?

Ollie 2011-06-27 15:32:20 EDT I don't normally use anything but the core package so it's probably something in one of the other packages that you have that has a bad default check my blog Do you have 5060 forwarded? #16 Stewart, Jul 15, 2013 hbonath Expand Collapse Guru Joined: Jan 24, 2012 Messages: 149 Likes Received: 39 AstDB "seems" to look fine, this particular CentOS 5 dies in March 2017 - migrate soon!Full time Geek, part time moderator. In fact, this works for any application you have and you want to debug why is going crazy.

If you have a voice trunk other than SIP, that also can make a difference. Although it cannot be reproduced with a SendDTMF() timeout of 45ms or above, it is quite easy to reproduce it manually by just fingering digits fast enough and this is very Utilizing the Distro you can run the update scripts provided in the wiki to get you to the latest version of Asterisk, all of the 6.2 releases have been EOL for this content The output of ps -LlFm -p `pidof asterisk` was: 4 - asterisk 2481 2480 - 90 17 - - - 17335 - 51616 - 14:53 pts/0 00:00:51 /usr/ 1 D asterisk

Sealert is currently nonfunctional. Reply Mike says: July 30, 2012 at 06:03 This really helps, in my case after find out the thread id consuming CPU, strace on the thread found there's futex flood, and Solution : Small php script : file('extensions_list.txt'); echo(count($myArray)." records\n"); for($i=0;$i where extensions_list.txt is 100 101 102 etc Problem : Followme are not recreated Solution : asterisk -rx "database

With rtpkeepalive on I always got the CPU usage spike at least 15-20 seconds into the call, regardless of how many calls were running.

Why are there no Imperial KX-series Security Droids in the original trilogy? Correct, 2.210.62-7 is where I'm at. If not I just want to clarify that, yes, we all do get along quite well. What can be causing this high load?

Ward talks to us privately on the phone all the time I don't want people to think there is ill will between freepbx and pbx in a flash. Check out Asterisk dimensioning and you will see that you can do 1000 simultaneous calls with even worse hardware. Download in other formats: Comma-delimited Text Tab-delimited Text RSS Feed Powered by Trac 1.0.1 By Edgewall Software. http://1pxcare.com/cpu-usage/osx-mds-high-cpu-usage.html The only way to get it to settle down is to restart asterisk, which I've been doing with a 'core restart gracefully' This particular system has about 80 users and is

It should be also noted that it takes just one call to reproduce the problem and cause one CPU to go 100%. Asterisk process hits 99% #3 hbonath, Jul 2, 2013 wardmundy Expand Collapse Nerd Uno Joined: Oct 12, 2007 Messages: 12,576 Likes Received: 1,858 Are HylaFax and AvantFax running on this Even at that CPU usage would barely hit %10, sometimes up to %15. In this case both calls were genereted from a dedicated server and terminated on another dedicated server.

Is there any way to take stable Long exposure photos without using Tripod? Ollie QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance Docs Contact: URL: Whiteboard: Keywords: Depends On: Blocks: Show dependency tree /graph Reported: 2011-06-26 18:30 EDT by Wolfgang Rupprecht Modified: 2011-09-20 12:53 As a result RTP packets from Call 1 in both directions are delayed by 150-160 ms and are being sent in bursts. top Actual results: asterisk chews up 100% of the cpu Expected results: Asterisk uses little to no cpu while just sitting there.

Maybe setting rtpkeepalive simply triggers the problem faster, but is not the root cause for it? Maybe with "strace" you could try to determine if threads come from Asterisk or not. –Icarokun Sep 19 '13 at 15:27 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote You may Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal current community Will that upgrade keep me on asterisk 1.8?

I see you mention an "authorized" user, are you thinking there could be a phone with a bad SIP Secret trying to reg over and over again? Thanks. Browse other questions tagged centos asterisk or ask your own question. I used a Citrix virtual server with a single core for the last set of tests: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 44 model name

Asterisk should then be using res_timing_pthread. 14 older comments Hide Permalink hristo added a comment - 12/Jul/13 9:46 AM I just finished testing with SVN-branch-1.8-r391778 on the Ubuntu server. Even at that CPU usage would barely hit %10, sometimes up to %15. Indeed, using strace on the LWP is another cool way of seeing what your multi-threaded app is doing.